Soon after however, Khler was named the second
director of the newly established Primate Station on the island of Tenerife off
the west coast of Africa. The station had been established so that Ņthe
behavior of the chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and gibbon would be studied and
compared, permitting a better evaluation of these animals on an evolutionary
scaleÓ (Teuber, 1994, p. 552). Tenerife was picked because of its relatively
constant weather and its nearness to Cameroon, then a German colony, and a
place were apes could be captured in the wild for study under more controlled
conditions. The apes had preceded the arrival of the first director, Eugen
Teuber. Upon his arrival he quickly found and developed a site, hired an animal
keeper, and began filmed observational studies. TeuberÕs research focused on
the animalÕs emotional behavior and their communication abilities. However,
once Khler arrived, he and Teuber began studying the apeÕs cognitive
abilities. Working together, they set up a fruit basket that was suspended in
the air by means of a rope and pulley. At the end of the rope, a large ring
hooked onto a tree limb held the fruit in place. Khler hoped that the apes
would examine the rigging of the basket and simply unhook the ring and get the
fruit. That never happened. Instead, a chimpanzee named Sultan learned to
dislodge the fruit from the basket by vigorously shaking the rope and causing
the fruit to fall to the ground. Quickly, Khler realized that his initial
experiment was too complicated. Figure 12.x shows a schematic view of the
problem. It was drawn by KhlerÕs first wife, Thekla.
--------------Insert Figure
12.x about here [Fruit basket experiment]---------------
After Teuber left for home and because Khler believed
he, too, only had a year to conduct his research, he quickly went to work. He
could not foresee or imagine that he would end up staying on Tenerife for
nearly six years. The outbreak of World War I in August 1914 was the event that
led to his long sojourn on the island.
Following
the failure of the fruit basket experiment, Khler devised simpler tests for
his animals. He provided them with wooden crates that they could move and stack.
Later, he hung a banana out of reach, from the netting that formed the roof of
the animal enclosure. Sultan, later judged the smartest of the stationÕs apes,
solved the problem in about five minutes. But, his solution was unlike any
previously described example of animal learning. Unlike ThorndikeÕs cats, for
instance, he showed no evidence of trial-and-error learning. Instead, Sultan
first attempted to retrieve the banana by jumping up for it. When that failed,
he quit trying for a short period. Then, he jumped up, grabbed a box, and
placed it directly under the banana.
Now, he was close enough to jump up and grab it. From that point on, getting
the banana was accomplished in the same way. Khler named this type of learning
as insight learning. It was
characterized by the sudden appearance of a solution after a period of
quiescence. Khler interpreted SultanÕs
Marginal Definition: Insight Learning-a type of learning in which a solution to a problem
appears suddenly, usually after a period of time has passed since the problem
was first presented.
solution in Gestalt terms. He
believed that Sultan had reorganized the problem cognitively. The ape had
somehow realized that putting the box right under the banana was the solution. Khler
devised other similar tests including hanging the banana higher so that boxes
had to be stacked upon each other in order to retrieve the banana, tests
---------------Insert Figure
12.x about here [Chimpanzees and stack of boxes]---------------
involving the use of sticks to
retrieve food items, and detour tasks. He also compared the behavior of his
apes to that of dogs, chickens, and a young child. Another test he used
demonstrated the phenomenon of transposition.
He used chickens first and chimpanzees later. The chickens first learned to discriminate
between two gray boxes, learning to
Marginal Definition: transposition-learning the relationship between two stimuli and
subsequently transferring that learning to other pairs of stimuli.
choose the lighter shade. Next, Khler
tested them with the original light gray box and a newer one colored an even
lighter gray. The chickens now chose the new lighter shade. Chimpanzees showed
the same pattern, only the stimuli varied in size not in color. He concluded
that both species had learned a relationship
because neither picked the original training stimulus. Thus, he used Gestalt
psychology to interpret his animal learning experiments. He believed he had
demonstrated that his apes had exhibited intelligent behavior, a radical
concept at the time. Remarkably, he wrote up his results and had them published
while still at Tenerife, while war raged in Europe. His book, The Mentality of the Apes, was published
in German in 1917 and in English in a few years later (Khler, 1925). Although
the book made him world famous, he left animal research behind after his return
to Germany.