Neo-Freudians
Modified: 2024-07-08 11:56 AM CDST
-
Freud's effect on the intellectual community was major.
- Soon after he
first proposed his theory, he began to attract others to Vienna, the
city where he lived.
- Eventually, a group formed with Freud as its
head, called the "Vienna Circle."
- Many of the members of the Vienna
Circle later became influential in psychoanalytic theory.
- Freud,
however, as the founder of psychoanalysis, looked at any modifications
of his original notions as improper.
- The disagreements between Freud
and anyone who would change psychoanalysis often led to the latter's
expulsion from the Vienna Circle.
- The term Neo-Freudians (New
Freudians) is often used to describe those psychoanalysts who changed
Freud's original theory in some way, both before and after Freud's
death.
- Realize however, that all of the Neo-Freudians accepted the
bulk of Freud's ideas; they simply made some modifications. Below we
will look at a few Neo-Freudians.
- Carl Jung was the first major figure to come to Vienna to visit
Freud.
- Their first meeting at Freud's house lasted many hours because they
were so taken with each other.
- They began a close collaboration but
it did not last.
- Jung began to modify Freud's original notions, and
Freud could not abide it.
- Jung and Freud parted company so bitterly
that there is no known instance of their communicating further for
the rest of Freud's life.
- Jung's ideas have survived, however, nearly
as well as Freud's have.
- Jung developed a more complex version of psychoanalysis,
introducing more terms and constructs.
- These include:
- the shadow,
- anima, animus,
- and persona.
- But the most radical idea that Jung
introduced was probably the collective unconscious.
- The collective
unconscious existed alongside Freud's personal unconscious, according
to Jung.
- The collective unconscious served as a reservoir of
inherited unconscious memories from one's ancestors.
- Thus, Jung could
account, in his mind, for topics like national differences in
personality.
- Needless to say, the collective unconscious aroused much
controversy.
- Jung, especially late in life, developed an interest in
universal symbols.
- He believed hey could be used as evidence for the
existence of the collective unconscious.
- He described the mandala as
one of those symbols.
- Mandalas consist of a combination of a circle
and a cross.
- Jung did find mandalas in cultures around the world, but
simpler explanations, such as development of children's progressive
ability to draw crossed lines and circles, may suffice to explain
their prevalence.
- Afred Adler was another major Neo-Freudian.
- He was an early
member of the Vienna Circle, and he was later evicted from that group
.
- Adler's sin, in Freud's eyes, was his introduction of social
factors into psychoanalytic theory.
- Adler drew upon the concepts of
inferiority and superiority, and named complexes after both.
- He
argued that social interactions lead to such feelings.
- Children who
are consistently treated as special by their peers and parents, for
example, will develop feelings of superiority.
- While children who
were consistently treated as unwanted would develop feelings of
inferiority.
- Imagine, for example, the social consequences on a child
of always being among the first to be picked to play, and then
imagine the consequences of always being the last to be picked.
- Adler
became quite influential in psychoanalytic theory.
- He was one of the first to examine birth-order effects in personality.
- A group known as the psychosocial Neo-Freudians also emerged.
- Members of that group thought that Freud had invested too heavily in
psychosexual motivation as an explanatory tool in his theory.
- They
offered, much as Adler did, a more psychosocial approach to
psychoanalysis.
- Psychosocial meant that those theorists gave more
emphasis to the effects of social interactions on personality
development than Freud did.
- Erikson, for example, proposed an
influential set of eight lifelong stages to replace Freud's five
childhood stages.
- Fromm and Horney emphasized the effects of
interpersonal factors on the personality.
- Today, psychoanalysis is not the force it once was.
- One reason for
its decline is its less than scientific character.
- Another reason for
its decline may be perceptual.
- Freudian concepts have wound
themselves into our culture so tightly that we hardly even notice
them anymore.
- In the intellectual community today, one is more likely
to find Freudian theory discussed in literature and criticism than in
psychology.
Back to Chapter 12 Lectures